Archives

IONQ CLASS ACTION NOTICE: Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP Files Securities Fraud Lawsuit Against IonQ, Inc.

IONQ CLASS ACTION NOTICE Glancy Prongay _ Murray LLP Files Securities Fraud Lawsuit Against IonQ_ Inc. logo/IT Digest

Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP , announces that it has filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, captioned Leacock v. IonQ, Inc., et al., Case No. 22-cv-1306, on behalf of persons and entities that purchased or otherwise acquired IonQ, Inc. securities between March 30, 2021 and May 2, 2022, inclusive (the “Class Period”). Plaintiff pursues claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

“scam built on phony statements about nearly all key aspects of the technology and business.”

Investors are hereby notified that they have 60 days from this notice to move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff in this action.

On May 3, 2022, Scorpion Capital released a research report alleging, among other things, that IonQ is a “scam built on phony statements about nearly all key aspects of the technology and business.” It further claimed that the Company reported “[f]ictitious ‘revenue’ via sham transactions and related-party round-tripping.”

On this news, the Company’s stock fell $0.71, or 9%, to close at $7.15 per share on May 3, 2022, on unusually heavy trading volume.

The complaint filed in this class action alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material adverse facts about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects. Specifically, Defendants failed to disclose to investors: (1) that IonQ had not yet developed a 32-qubit quantum computer; (2) that the Company’s 11-qubit quantum computer suffered from significant error rates, rendering it useless; (3) that IonQ’s quantum computer is not sufficiently reliable, so it is not accessible despite being available through major cloud providers; (4) that a significant portion of IonQ’s revenue was derived from improper round-tripping transactions with related parties; and (5) that, as a result of the foregoing, Defendants’ positive statements about the Company’s business, operations, and prospects were materially misleading and/or lacked a reasonable basis at all relevant times.

Also Read: Black Knight Announces Strategic Alliance With Percy to Provide an Advanced Client Engagement Solution

If you purchased or otherwise acquired IonQ securities during the Class Period, you may move the Court no later than 60 days from this notice to ask the Court to appoint you as lead plaintiff. To be a member of the Class you need not take any action at this time; you may retain counsel of your choice or take no action and remain an absent member of the Class.